The survey materials before the EU pointed out that the alternative to traditional energy-saving light bulbs, the annual 15
million tons of carbon dioxide emissions. The energy consumption of conventional bulbs, less than 15% used for lighting, the
rest into heat energy; 50% of the energy consumption of energy-saving lamps for lighting. According to expert estimates
Austria, the Austrian family with an incandescent lamp of 66 million, of which 2/3 replaced with energy-saving lamps a year
can save electricity of € 380 million, a decrease of 1 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions.
However, some controversy over the prohibitive energy-saving lamps. 1000 Austrians, according to pollsters survey, 63.8% of
people think that energy-saving lamps to replace the traditional light and not make much sense, only 4.8% of the light bulb
at home all replaced with energy-saving lamps, 24% of people The family had no energy-saving lamps. The reason they do not
have energy-saving lights First, the light quality of traditional light bulbs, energy saving lamps do not have such a soft
light quality; two energy-saving lamps contain toxic mercury and subsequently deal with the problem is relatively complex; is
the energy-saving lamps is a transitional product after a few years will be replaced by LED lighting technology. European
manufacturers now control 95% of the energy-saving lamp market in Europe, they are eager to recover the investment in energy
-saving lamps.
没有评论:
发表评论